Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > World A-Teams
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

World A-Teams National A teams are selected by our members. WAT Future Test Player Award voting. Up-and-coming players are discussed. Recent interviews: Davey Jacobs; Graeme Aldridge; Hashim Amla; Joseph Yovich; Morne van Wyk; Richard Sherlock; Other interviews

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 20-03-2008, 02:34 AM in reply to sittingduck's post starting "Oh right, four middle order men not..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Quote:
Originally Posted by sittingduck View Post
Oh right, four middle order men not five. How do people feel and Voges as fourth batsmen and White being counted as a seamer in place of Harris, though White would still bat at six.
Not great when White is a spinner. Though this method could solve the spinner problem:

Openers: Broad + Hughes
Middle Order: Marsh, Bailey, Pomersbach, Voges
Keeper: Ronchi + Hartley
Spinners: Casson + White
Seamers: Bollinger, Magoffin, Siddle, Harris

How are people with that line-up? We may wish Watson to replace Harris??
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 20-03-2008, 04:35 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Does Chris Hartley..."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI) Passed Allan Rae's 1016 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, South Africa
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael View Post
Does Chris Hartley have any genuine rivals in glovework? Any fool can be taught to bat: an 'A' side should concentrate on good hands!
I don't know if Ronchi has ever played County cricket, but you shouldn't let his reputation with the bat blind you to his 'keeping. On his CricInfo profile, it calls him "an accomplished gloveman." And that's all that needs to be said. He may not be unobtrusive in the classical style, but he has great reflexes behind the stumps, and he is as far as I know a natural gloveman- not a manufactured one in the manner of Stewart or Dhoni. Saying that, Dhoni lately has been looking very good behind the stumps, and I'd say that Ronchi is about the same standard.
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 20-03-2008, 04:38 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Not great when White is a spinner...."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI) Passed Allan Rae's 1016 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, South Africa
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mellon View Post
How are people with that line-up? We may wish Watson to replace Harris??
Not Watson, no. And I'm not convinced Harris should be the fourth seamer, either. If you want the fourth seamer to be an allrounder, then Andrew MacDonald knocks Watson's socks off, and I think Ben Edmonson would be a better specialist than Harris. He's more expensive, but he has the happy knack of regularly being able to take wickets in a heap, and that's reflected in his SR of 45.
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 21-03-2008, 03:20 AM in reply to Aurelius's post starting "Not Watson, no. And I'm not convinced..."
sittingduck sittingduck is offline
WAT New Zealand A Selector
(SA) Passed Peter Pollock's 607 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
My main national team: New Zealand
Posts: 610
Yes Andy your right, I was writing White but meaning Watson.

I like White as the second spinner though so I guess my original idea does still work albeit in the correct category. Gives some flexibility to the squad.
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 21-03-2008, 03:39 AM in reply to sittingduck's post starting "Yes Andy your right, I was writing..."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI) Passed Allan Rae's 1016 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, South Africa
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by sittingduck View Post
Yes Andy your right, I was writing White but meaning Watson.
The only reason to select an allrounder for the fourth seamer (as far as I can see) is that he provides a better batting option than a specialist. Given that, then IMO there's no way MacDonald can be left out for Watson. MacDonald averaged almost 50 with the bat, Watson averaged an undramatic 33. And while it's true that Watson's bowling figures were better, he's not that good a bowler because he doesn't know what his limitations are. You can tell because he's always trying to bowl fast and sacrificing accuracy, and trying to bowl scorching bouncers which just go to the boundary. So someone like Watson will never IMO be as good an allrounder as someone who does bowl within his limitations- the Moodys, Ervines, Hopes' and, yes, the MacDonalds.
Reply With Quote
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 21-03-2008, 02:58 PM in reply to Aurelius's post starting "The only reason to select an allrounder..."
acker's Avatar
acker acker is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI) Passed Lawrence Rowe's 2047 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: now SW New South Wales
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Western Bulldogs
Posts: 2,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurelius View Post
And that's also a statement of opinion, isn't it? After his prolific season last year, everyone here in the West said that Chris Rogers ought to be the next cab off the rank after Langer. But it was not to be. Siddle's only played five matches this season, only nine in total, so I'm personally a little reluctant to say that he's the next Test bowler, because he could very easily do as Ben Hilfenhaus did this year.
I think 9-167 out of 18-844 against the NSW batting lineup including top order test caps Jaques, Katich & Clarke + the soon to be test cap Haddin may hold Siddle in better stead than Hilfenhaus.

As might his average of 17.06 which is a fair bit better than Hilfenhaus's 25.38 last season
Cricinfo - Records - Season 2006/07 in Australia - First-class matches - Bowling averages

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurelius View Post
Well, now that the season's over and the stats are finalised, we can now see how high the standard really has been this season.

1. Phillip Hughes- 555 runs @ 62.1
2. Ryan Broad- 528 runs @ 31.44
3. Shaun Marsh- 663 runs @ 60.3
4. George Bailey- 734 runs @ 43.2
5. Luke Pomersbach- 743 runs @ 61.1
6.Cameron White- 748 runs @ 49.8, 6 wickets @ 47
7. Luke Ronchi- 444 runs @ 40.4, 33 dismissals
8. Beau Casson- 485 runs @ 60.6, 29 wickets @ 35.2
9. Steve Magoffin- 178 runs @17.8, 35 wickets @ 25.5
10. Peter Siddle- 93 runs @ 11.3, 33 wickets @ 17.1
11. Doug Bollinger- 22 runs @ 7.3, 45 wickets @ 15.4

And what's really encouraging for me is the middle order- I think they're 24, 26, 23 amd 23 respectively. Compare that to last season, when it was 27-28-29.
I'm not impressed with Broad averaging 31.5 being there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael View Post
Does Chris Hartley have any genuine rivals in glovework? Any fool can be taught to bat: an 'A' side should concentrate on good hands!
You prove to me where your choice Rachael, in this case "Hartley" is offering the Australia A team consistantly more than 17 runs per innings (and I am being more than fair with him considering he bats further down the order and has twice as many not outs as Ronchi) then I might give your argument some credence.

Until then IMHO it seems way off the boil.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurelius View Post
The only reason to select an allrounder for the fourth seamer (as far as I can see) is that he provides a better batting option than a specialist. Given that, then IMO there's no way MacDonald can be left out for Watson. MacDonald averaged almost 50 with the bat, Watson averaged an undramatic 33. And while it's true that Watson's bowling figures were better, he's not that good a bowler because he doesn't know what his limitations are. You can tell because he's always trying to bowl fast and sacrificing accuracy, and trying to bowl scorching bouncers which just go to the boundary. So someone like Watson will never IMO be as good an allrounder as someone who does bowl within his limitations- the Moodys, Ervines, Hopes' and, yes, the MacDonalds.
Bloody good point

After the P'cup final I would have ditched Thornley and McDonald for Watson in a devil you know type of response. But in Watsons case this year he is a guy with an interupted season due to injury and the other two McDonald & Thornley have kept on keeping on like they did last season. So Watson's figures look shoddy and we select our A-team on current form, so he currently looks like an unlikely inclusion.

Lets just remember in saying that, Cameron White is still in the selection frame and he broke his ankle during the season. So there is no reason that if Watson's performances were better why he shouldn't be in the selection process.

But I will add to that comment Shane Watson has opened the batting for Australia in ODI's before

And Shane Watson's(439 runs 7 matches) average 33.76 with no not outs is ahead of his Queensland team-mates Ryan Broad(566 runs 10 matches) 31.44 also no not outs.

Watson also took 9 wickets at 30.33 in those 7 matches.
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 22-03-2008, 03:31 AM in reply to acker's post starting "I think 9-167 out of 18-844 against the..."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI) Passed Allan Rae's 1016 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, South Africa
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by acker View Post
I think 9-167 out of 18-844 against the NSW batting lineup including top order test caps Jaques, Katich & Clarke + the soon to be test cap Haddin may hold Siddle in better stead than Hilfenhaus.

As might his average of 17.06 which is a fair bit better than Hilfenhaus's 25.38 last season
Cricinfo - Records - Season 2006/07 in Australia - First-class matches - Bowling averages
I'm not disputing that he had a very good season. But that's really not the point, and it's also irrelevant that his figures are better than Hilfenhaus' were last year. He's only played 9 matches. And although he displayed very good form in the five he played this year, form can desert you. That's why I mentioned Hilfenhaus- not to say that he was necessarily better, but that he was in very good form one year, and distinctly ordinary form the next. Siddle will have to perform to something very close to his stnadards this year for the next couple of seasons to prove to me that he should be the next pace bowler.

Quote:
I'm not impressed with Broad averaging 31.5 being there.
He averaged 33. It's still not particularly impressive, but I hate the idea of putting in a makeshift opener instead of a proper one, even if the makeshift had a better season. Besides, Broad and Hughes has balance IMO- the defensive right-hander who can take the shine off the ball, rotating the strike to the more aggressive lefty who can dominate the bowling.

Quote:
But in Watsons case this year he is a guy with an interupted season due to injury...
Well, the fact that he's constantly injured doesn't really help his case.
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 22-03-2008, 05:16 AM in reply to Aurelius's post starting "I'm not disputing that he had a very..."
acker's Avatar
acker acker is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI) Passed Lawrence Rowe's 2047 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: now SW New South Wales
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Western Bulldogs
Posts: 2,060
I hate to say it on the batting side of things I think this years candidates are no where near as strong as last years.

Anyone else got a team they want to post up for a look ?
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2008, 01:12 AM in reply to acker's post starting "I hate to say it on the batting side of..."
Quagmire's Avatar
Quagmire Quagmire is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
WAT Journalist
Moderator
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: melbourne
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria, Lancashire, Durham
Posts: 1,646
Hello all long time no speak. This is what my side looks like & all the stats are career stats because you cant go off one season.

  1. Phillip Hughes (19 yrs old) - 7 mat, 559 runs at 62.11, hs 116, 1x100, 6x50
  2. Ed Cowan (25 yrs old) - 22 mat, 1251 runs at 32.92, hs 137*, 3x100, 4x50
  3. George Bailey (25 yrs old) - 36 mat, 2323 runs at 38.71, hs 155, 5x100, 14x50
  4. Adam Voges (28 yrs old) - 40 mat, 2339 runs at 40.32,hs 180, 7x100, 8x50
  5. Luke Pomersbach (23 yrs old) - 12 mat, 949 runs at 52.72, hs 176, 2x100, 7x50
  6. Cameron White (C) (24 yrs old) - 92 mat, 5557 runs at 41.47, hs 206*, 13x100, 24x50 + 161 wickets at 38.24, bb 6/66
  7. Luke Ronchi (26 yrs old) - 28 mat, 1480 runs at 37.94, hs 107, 3x100, 9x50
  8. Steve Magoffin (28 yrs old) - 40 mat, 130 wickets at 28.50, bb 8/47
  9. Peter Siddle (23 yrs old) - 9 mat, 40 wickers at 21.52, bb 6/57
  10. Ben Hilfenhaus (25 yrs old) 30 mat, 127 wickets at 31.11, bb 7/58
  11. Doug Bollinger (26 yrs old) - 43 mat, 133 wickets at 31.76, bb 6/63
I think that alot of people would not agree with Hilfenhaus because he had a bad season but he is still in the best 11 players under the age of 30 in the country. Cameron White is a obvious choice as captain of the side, I didnt chose a spinner because I dont think that anyone is really deserving I think the part time spin of White & Voges plus an extra quick would be as valuble if not more that a bowler like Dan Cullen, Cullen Bailey, Beau Casson or any other young spinner at the moment.
__________________
Bill Ponsford - The only one who could play in Bradman’s company and make it a duet.
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2008, 01:35 AM in reply to Quagmire's post starting "Hello all long time no speak. This is..."
acker's Avatar
acker acker is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI) Passed Lawrence Rowe's 2047 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: now SW New South Wales
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Western Bulldogs
Posts: 2,060
Welcome back "Quaggy"

from your post
[QUOTE]"like Dan Cullen, Cullen Bailey, Beau Casson or any other young spinner at the moment."[/quote]

This was the same big issue we had last year.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:03 AM.

Page generated in 0.590 seconds (70.46% PHP - 29.54% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0