Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurelius And that's also a statement of opinion, isn't it? After his prolific season last year, everyone here in the West said that Chris Rogers ought to be the next cab off the rank after Langer. But it was not to be. Siddle's only played five matches this season, only nine in total, so I'm personally a little reluctant to say that he's the next Test bowler, because he could very easily do as Ben Hilfenhaus did this year. |
I think 9-167 out of 18-844 against the NSW batting lineup including top order test caps Jaques, Katich & Clarke + the soon to be test cap Haddin may hold Siddle in better stead than Hilfenhaus.
As might his average of 17.06 which is a fair bit better than Hilfenhaus's 25.38 last season
Cricinfo - Records - Season 2006/07 in Australia - First-class matches - Bowling averages Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurelius Well, now that the season's over and the stats are finalised, we can now see how high the standard really has been this season.
1. Phillip Hughes- 555 runs @ 62.1
2. Ryan Broad- 528 runs @ 31.44
3. Shaun Marsh- 663 runs @ 60.3
4. George Bailey- 734 runs @ 43.2
5. Luke Pomersbach- 743 runs @ 61.1
6.Cameron White- 748 runs @ 49.8, 6 wickets @ 47
7. Luke Ronchi- 444 runs @ 40.4, 33 dismissals
8. Beau Casson- 485 runs @ 60.6, 29 wickets @ 35.2
9. Steve Magoffin- 178 runs @17.8, 35 wickets @ 25.5
10. Peter Siddle- 93 runs @ 11.3, 33 wickets @ 17.1
11. Doug Bollinger- 22 runs @ 7.3, 45 wickets @ 15.4
And what's really encouraging for me is the middle order- I think they're 24, 26, 23 amd 23 respectively. Compare that to last season, when it was 27-28-29. |
I'm not impressed with Broad averaging 31.5 being there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael Does Chris Hartley have any genuine rivals in glovework? Any fool can be taught to bat: an 'A' side should concentrate on good hands! |
You prove to me where your choice Rachael, in this case "Hartley" is offering the Australia A team consistantly more than 17 runs per innings (and I am being more than fair with him considering he bats further down the order and has twice as many not outs as Ronchi) then I might give your argument some credence.
Until then IMHO it seems way off the boil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurelius The only reason to select an allrounder for the fourth seamer (as far as I can see) is that he provides a better batting option than a specialist. Given that, then IMO there's no way MacDonald can be left out for Watson. MacDonald averaged almost 50 with the bat, Watson averaged an undramatic 33. And while it's true that Watson's bowling figures were better, he's not that good a bowler because he doesn't know what his limitations are. You can tell because he's always trying to bowl fast and sacrificing accuracy, and trying to bowl scorching bouncers which just go to the boundary. So someone like Watson will never IMO be as good an allrounder as someone who does bowl within his limitations- the Moodys, Ervines, Hopes' and, yes, the MacDonalds. |
Bloody good point
After the P'cup final I would have ditched Thornley and McDonald for Watson in a devil you know type of response. But in Watsons case this year he is a guy with an interupted season due to injury and the other two McDonald & Thornley have kept on keeping on like they did last season. So Watson's figures look shoddy and we select our A-team on current form, so he currently looks like an unlikely inclusion.
Lets just remember in saying that, Cameron White is still in the selection frame and he broke his ankle during the season. So there is no reason that if Watson's performances were better why he shouldn't be in the selection process.
But I will add to that comment Shane Watson has opened the batting for Australia in ODI's before
And Shane Watson's(439 runs 7 matches) average 33.76 with no not outs is ahead of his Queensland team-mates Ryan Broad(566 runs 10 matches) 31.44 also no not outs.
Watson also took 9 wickets at 30.33 in those 7 matches.