I dont think so django
this is one of the good performance by the aus a but i cant figure out any great bowlers from the australian second string
even stuart clarke does not have much variation to make batsmen struggle like his mentor mcgrath
mitchel johnson and dorey are very average to write about
shane watson the australian version of liam plumkett
batting wise also only one or two who could do some good but not really as threatening as their predecessors
this match played in a wicket which is becoming slower and slower as the day progress
obviously the indians are behind after the 2 days
but dont forget india a is the only team which have not got any defeat so far in the top end series
i wont write off india a (but i dont see australia dominating the world cricket like their old ones after 2 years because most of their player are in over 32 years range ,whereas other a teams like india -a ,pakistan-a and west indies a are improved alot over last 2 years with some good young players)

India A lucky.The match washed away due to rain.

__________________
Karthik Venkatesan

Its funny due to Australia dominating for so long, every other country is betting on them being horrible in the next couple of years. I personally dont think they will dominate but they will be in the top two. Because there is a lot of talent coming through the ranks, the batting will be as strong but the bowling will go down hill after Warne and McGrath. When Lillee and Thomson retired the same discussion came up about how it was the end of Australia and there would never be bowlers as good as them again. Since then Australia have had alot of great bowlers and the same will happen after McGrath and Warne.

__________________
Bill Ponsford - The only one who could play in Bradman’s company and make it a duet.