Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > World A-Teams
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

World A-Teams National A teams are selected by our members. WAT Future Test Player Award voting. Up-and-coming players are discussed. Recent interviews: Davey Jacobs; Graeme Aldridge; Hashim Amla; Joseph Yovich; Morne van Wyk; Richard Sherlock; Other interviews

View Poll Results: Likely result:
Easy win for Pakistan 0 0%
Win for Pakistan 0 0%
Draw 6 75.00%
Win for the 'A' team 2 25.00%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 12:36 PM in reply to Pete's post starting "Typical! A guy who should be nowhere..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
Typical! A guy who should be nowhere near any England team, tramples on our main bowler. Idiot.
Look on the bright side: Lewis is a like for like replacement of similar calibre (and presumably the back-up for Hoggard for the Ashes) - if he gets more International cricket as a result of this then great :-)
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 01:20 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Look on the bright side: Lewis is a..."
Lemming Lemming is offline
(NZ-captain) Passed Jeff Crowe's 1601 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
...Lewis is a like for like replacement of similar calibre [to Matthew Hoggard]...
Come on Rachael, how can you say that Lewis is a bowler of a similar calibre to Hoggard? We have seen nothing from Lewis to indicate that he can consistently take test match wickets. We have seen this from Hoggard.

Lewis has played one test match, Hoggard 54. For every test match wicket Lewis has taken, Hoggard can boast over 70! Hoggard has proved time and time again that he can take wickets and has risen to arguably the most competent swing bowler in the world. Hoggard - over the past year or so - has showed that he can act as a spearhead for the England team taking 58 wickets @ 26.10 in 2005 (strike rate 42.2) and 28 @ 21.46, going at less than 2.5 an over having bowled over 240 overs, in 2006 with a strike rate of 52.0.

How you can justify Lewis can even be considered a 'like for like replacement of similar calibre' to Hoggard, I'll never know.

There is no real bright side, we need our current best bowler fit and taking the wickets he always does. Lewis has far to go in a small space of time - he's already one year Hoggard's senior - before he can leave a side unweakened after replacing Hoggard. It's a huge loss for England if Hoggard can't make any test in the forthcoming series.
__________________
Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater!
Albert Einstein, 1879-1955
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 02:27 PM in reply to Lemming's post starting "Come on Rachael, how can you say that..."
Collyisamackem's Avatar
Collyisamackem Collyisamackem is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chester, UK
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Somerset
Posts: 3,368
Jamie "Deadly" Dalrymple is continuing to impress, bagging Inzi for a duck (c Loudon) and claiming his second wicket from 7 overs for only 7 runs! Pakistan 134/4, Broad and Bresnan with one wicket apiece and nothing yet from the Hogster after the farce earlier on!
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 04:12 PM in reply to Collyisamackem's post starting "Jamie "Deadly" Dalrymple is..."
Vrock's Avatar
Vrock Vrock is offline
Moderator
WAT Journalist  
Creator of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
Read my Articles
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(ENG-captain) Passed Ted Dexter's 4502 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yorkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: West Indies, Yorkshire
Posts: 4,433
Send a message via Yahoo to Vrock
A flat wicket and the two spinners are in the wickets - there is hope for Monty.

Dalrymple has 3 to his name

Loudon has just the 1 from only six overs.

216-6 and England A might contemplate enforcing the follow-on.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 04:27 PM in reply to Vrock's post starting "A flat wicket and the two spinners are..."
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
Pakistan 233/7; England A 595/9 dec

PAK getting well and truly thrashed here; carry on playing with this woeful ineptitude and they will get a 4-0 drubbing, weather permitting. And the surprising thing (okay, not that surprising if you actually follow Pakistan) is that the openers, the alleged weak link, have done okay; its the middle order that has collapsed. And that's before we talk about the apparently atrocious bowling by the likes of Kaneria, Asif, Sami and Gul. Can they all claim they are short of match practice? The batsmen probably are, especially Inzi, Yousaf and Kamran. But the bowlers? Many of them have just come from lengthy stints at various counties, so the lack of match practice excuse won't wash.
__________________
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes
Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 04:31 PM in reply to Maranello's post "Pakistan 233/7; England A 595/9 dec"
Henners Henners is offline
(AUS) Passed Damien Fleming's 305 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Daventry, United Kingdom
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Northamptonshire, Essex and Somerset
Posts: 325
Just send out the 'A' Team, forget the main team! But I am sure Pakistan will up their game for the test series. Out of all the players we have seen in this game, who would you say deserves to be in the full team? I would say Robert Key, he is proving to be a useful captain, plus his century. Read and Dalrymple are doing well also, but if you had the choice, would you play Dalrymple or Key in the England squad? Finally, after Reads first Innings ton, he is looking better than jones, but its early days yet. Will he get another decent score in the second innings, we'll have to wait and see.

Last edited by Henners : 08-07-2006 at 04:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 04:34 PM in reply to Henners's post starting "Just send out the 'A' Team, forget the..."
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henners
I would say Robert Key, but others have convinced me.
Read and Dalrymple should be ahead of Key, as they fill a natural "vacancy" in the side, whereas Key will be aiming to compete with the likes of Cook, Bell, Collingwood et al, who all have equally good, if not better, cases for selection. Assuming that all of Tresco, Strauss and KP are fit and selected, only two batting spots would be up for grabs, and by rights, Collingwood should get one of them. Which means that it is one of Key, Bell or Cook for the last remaining spot!
__________________
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes
Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 05:21 PM in reply to Maranello's post starting "Read and Dalrymple should be ahead of..."
darksideofthemoon's Avatar
darksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(WI) Passed Michael Holding's 910 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancs, England A Team
Posts: 911
Trescothick
Cook
Strauss
Pietersen
Collingwood
Dalrymple (Has a first class 200)
Read
Broad
Harmison
Hoggard (I'm sure he will be fine but I'll be as sick as a dog if Lewis is chosen)
Panesar
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 06:59 PM in reply to Maranello's post starting "Read and Dalrymple should be ahead of..."
adamberry's Avatar
adamberry adamberry is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year
Journalist
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(AUS-captain) Passed Jack Ryder's 1394 Test runs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: Kent, Ireland, Davington Priory CC
Posts: 1,401
Send a message via MSN to adamberry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maranello
Assuming that all of Tresco, Strauss and KP are fit and selected, only two batting spots would be up for grabs, and by rights, Collingwood should get one of them. Which means that it is one of Key, Bell or Cook for the last remaining spot!
And the problem for the selectors is that just about all of them are worthy of a place. Cook has proven he can perform at Test level, while Bell and Key have got big scores in this match. Collingwood is one of those players who is just about a dead cert for a place.

Key's ton was his first of the season, so that could well rule him out, leaving Bell and Cook for the last spot. And Bell was involved in the Ashes series last year, so... well England selectors logic should mean Bell gets the last spot!

Broad bowled well and should be in the running for a place, however given England's injury worries with pacemen and Pakistan's alleged difficulty against spin, we should use two spinners. So a bowling lineup of Broad, Hoggard (if passed fit), Harmison, Dalrymple and Panesar would be the preferred option IMO.
__________________
"Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose."
- Ayrton Senna
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2006, 08:45 PM in reply to adamberry's post starting "And the problem for the selectors is..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,605
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamberry
And Bell was involved in the Ashes series last year, so... well England selectors logic should mean Bell gets the last spot! .
I think that would be a very good reason to keep Bell out of the side, but then again "England selectors logic"
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26 PM.

Page generated in 0.606 seconds (70.50% PHP - 29.50% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0